I'm not here to defend cable news. I'm not telling you every outlet is trustworthy or that institutional media doesn't have real problems. It does. The access journalism problem is real. The bothsidesism is infuriating. The profit-over-public-interest rot is absolutely real.
I've got no interest in telling you CNN or the Times are above criticism. They're not. Criticize them. Go ahead.
But "the media is the enemy of the people" is not a media critique. It's a playbook move. It's one of the first things authoritarian governments do — identify and delegitimize the people who can independently document what they're up to. That's not a coincidence. That's the whole fucking point.
There's a Difference
Actual media criticism sounds like: "That outlet has a specific bias and here's where it shows." Or: "That reporter has a pattern of getting this wrong." Or: "That story was poorly sourced and they had to retract it."
That's legitimate. That requires specifics. That requires actually engaging with the work.
"Enemy of the people" is a blanket designed to be pulled over your head so you stop paying attention to what's being documented underneath it. It's not skepticism. It's a shutdown switch.
The Closed Loop Problem
If every source you trust tells you exactly what you already believe, and every source that challenges you is automatically fake, corrupt, or an enemy — that's not being a critical thinker. That's a closed information loop. And those things are embarrassingly easy to exploit.
I'm not asking you to love the media. I don't love the media. I'm asking you to recognize when someone is using your distrust of the media as a tool to make you easier to manipulate.
Because that's exactly what's happening. And it's working. And it's pissing me off to watch people call that being informed.
← Back to rants